From: David L. Miller, P.E. [dlm@engfirepro.com]
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 4:56 PM
To: 'Dammon Engineering'
Subject: RE: Riverine - URS Comments

See the replies below.

 

David L. Miller, P.E.

Engineered Fire Protection, LLC

11920 Richcroft Avenue

Baton Rouge, Louisiana  70814

225-273-5040

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Dammon Engineering [mailto:dammoneng@bellsouth.net]
Sent:
Monday, July 06, 2009 1:54 PM
To: David L. Miller, P.E.; Craig Seals
Cc: dammoneng@bellsouth.net
Subject: RE: Riverine - URS Comments

 

 

July 6, 2009

 

David,

 

I need help with this too.

 

 

254

Design Analysis

Provide year of applicable codes.

By FPE. – Will add to the Analysis.

255

Design Analysis

Reference to 13: 11.2.2.3.1 appears to be incorrect.

By FPE. – Typo – Should be 13:11.2.3.2.3.1.

256

Design Analysis

Verify use of schedule 10 pipe is acceptable based on corrosion testing or history. See 4-2.3.2 of UFC 3-600-01.

By FPE. – Will determine based on test results.

257

Design Analysis

Provide evidence of acceptance by NAVFAC FPE that no hose allowance is acceptable.

By FPE. – Verbal at this time.  Will obtain in writing.

 

 

Thanks,

 

Robert Wiltse

Chief Architect

Dammon Engineering, Inc.